Example 1: glossary ----components glossary: term [short text] part [optional; choice: 'n','v','adj','adv','prep','pron','conj','int'] # part of speech: noun, verb, adjective, .... definition [text] ----layout # {var} refers to the value of "var" # anythign not in {curly brackets} is literal # In the display, {func(xxxx)} is the value of ther # function func(), where func() is a function defined # in the display specification. In the edit form, # {func(xxxx)} is just xxxx. [[{term}; {#1} [{part}; \[{#1}\]]][{definition}; {#1}]] # another way to write this is: arrangement: [[{term}; {#1} [{part}; \[{#1}\]]] [{definition}; {#1}]] order: term: alphabetical # the layout is described by [square brackets], so you need a backslash to indicate literal square brackets: \[\] # need to indicate the order. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX ----display css: term {font-weight:bold; width:100px} part {font-weight:normal; font-style: italics} #Note: items of type 'text' are automatically processed to # have a blank line in the text appear as a blank line in the html. ----example data (term:'spaghetti';definition:'long noodles used in Italian food') (term:'twirl';definition:'to gather noodles on a fork with a rotating motion'; part:'v') ----the results
spaghetti
long noodles used in Italian food
twirl
[v]
to gather noodles on a fork with a rotating motion
================================= Example 2: Math research problems ----components problem: id [identifier] type [choice: 'Problem','Conjecture'; default:'Problem'] number [optional; short text] attribution [optional; short text] lead-in [optional; text] statement [text] status [optional; text] remark [optional; repeatable; remark] arrangeable # meaning that the user can drag-and-drop to rearrange the blocks remark: id [identifier] problem [reference: problem.id] attribution [optional; short text] statement [text] arrangeable ----layout [ [{lead-in}; {#1}] [ [{type}; {#1} [{number}; {#1}.]] [{attribution}; \[{#1}\]] [{statement}; {#1}] ] [{status}; {#1}] [{remark}; Remark. [{#1.attribution}; #2]] [{#1.statement}; #2] ] ----display css: problem {padding: 0 0 10px 0} lead-in {padding: 0 0 10px 0} status {padding: 10px 0 0 0} remark {padding: 10px 0 0 0} type {font-weight:bold; padding:0 5px 0 0} number {font-weight:bold; padding:0 10px 0 0} attribution {font-weight:normal;padding:0 10px 0 0} statement {font-weight:normal; font-style: italic; padding: 0 0 40px 0} ----example data ( type:'Problem'; number: '1.1':'; attribution: 'Rips'; statement: 'Is there a JSJ decomposition for finitely presented groups over small groups?'; remark: [ [statement:'Dunwoody has announced recently a much more general result for groups acting on $\mathbb R$-trees that seems to imply the existence of JSJ decompositions over small groups. Guirardel and Levitt have also proposed a generalized JSJ theory in the spirit of outer space \cite{MR2319455}.'], [statement: 'The first case to look at is the case of decompositions over solvable Baumslag-Solitar groups. If such a decomposition exists then the edge groups of the decomposition won't necessarily be small (see \cite{MR2221253}). On the other hand there is a natural conjecture for the enclosing groups: one expects them to be fundamental groups of complexes of groups where the underlying complex is a square complex homeomorphic to a surface and all edges and faces are stabilized by a fixed group $F$ (the fiber). However the homomorphisms from edge groups to face groups are not necessarily isomorphisms.']] ) ( number: '1.2'; attribution: 'Panos Papasoglu'; lead-in: 'We call a splitting of $G$ over $C$ \emph{unfolded} if $G$ does not split over any proper subgroup of $C$.'; statement: 'Let $G$ be a finitely presented group that does not split over a virtually abelian group. Can $G$ have infinitely many unfolded splittings over distinct subgroups isomorphic to ${\mathbb F}_2$?'; status: 'This is just a test status statement'; remark: [ [statement:'A splitting of a group $G$ over a group $C_1$ is called \emph{elliptic} with respect to a splitting of $G$ over $C_2$ if $C_1$ fixes a point of the Bass-Serre tree of the splitting over $C_2$. Otherwise it is called hyperbolic. A pair of splittings of $G$ over $C_1,C_2$ can be elliptic-elliptic, elliptic-hyperbolic, hyperbolic-elliptic, hyperbolic-hyperbolic. A crucial observation for the JSJ theory of splittings of 1-ended finitely presented groups over $\mathbb Z$ is that any two splittings over infinite cyclic groups $C_1,C_2$ are either elliptic-elliptic or hyperbolic-hyperbolic. The Bestvina-Feighn accessibility theorem (\cite{MR1091614}) gives a bound on the number of elliptic-elliptic splittings over $\mathbb Z$ (and more generally over small groups). So the main issue for the JSJ theory is understanding hyperbolic-hyperbolic splittings. In the case of $\mathbb Z$-splittings it is easy to produce infinitely many distinct hyperbolic-hyperbolic splittings, just consider the splittings corresponding to simple closed curves on a surface. The JSJ theory says that in fact this is the only way in which such splittings arise. So the problem above asks whether there are families of hyperbolic-hyperbolic splittings over the free group of rank 2, ${\mathbb F}_2$. ']] ----------- the results
Problem 1.1 [Rips] Is there a JSJ decomposition for finitely presented groups over small groups?
Remark. Dunwoody has announced recently a much more general result for groups acting on $\mathbb R$-trees that seems to imply the existence of JSJ decompositions over small groups. Guirardel and Levitt have also proposed a generalized JSJ theory in the spirit of outer space \cite{MR2319455}.
Remark. The first case to look at is the case of decompositions over solvable Baumslag-Solitar groups. If such a decomposition exists then the edge groups of the decomposition won't necessarily be small (see \cite{MR2221253}). On the other hand there is a natural conjecture for the enclosing groups: one expects them to be fundamental groups of complexes of groups where the underlying complex is a square complex homeomorphic to a surface and all edges and faces are stabilized by a fixed group $F$ (the fiber). However the homomorphisms from edge groups to face groups are not necessarily isomorphisms.

We call a splitting of $G$ over $C$ \emph{unfolded} if $G$ does not split over any proper subgroup of $C$.
Problem 1.2 [Panos Papasoglu] Let $G$ be a finitely presented group that does not split over a virtually abelian group. Can $G$ have infinitely many unfolded splittings over distinct subgroups isomorphic to ${\mathbb F}_2$?
This is just a test status statement
Remark. A splitting of a group $G$ over a group $C_1$ is called \emph{elliptic} with respect to a splitting of $G$ over $C_2$ if $C_1$ fixes a point of the Bass-Serre tree of the splitting over $C_2$. Otherwise it is called hyperbolic.
A pair of splittings of $G$ over $C_1,C_2$ can be elliptic-elliptic, elliptic-hyperbolic, hyperbolic-elliptic, hyperbolic-hyperbolic.
A crucial observation for the JSJ theory of splittings of 1-ended finitely presented groups over $\mathbb Z$ is that any two splittings over infinite cyclic groups $C_1,C_2$ are either elliptic-elliptic or hyperbolic-hyperbolic.
The Bestvina-Feighn accessibility theorem (\cite{MR1091614}) gives a bound on the number of elliptic-elliptic splittings over $\mathbb Z$ (and more generally over small groups). So the main issue for the JSJ theory is understanding hyperbolic-hyperbolic splittings. In the case of $\mathbb Z$-splittings it is easy to produce infinitely many distinct hyperbolic-hyperbolic splittings, just consider the splittings corresponding to simple closed curves on a surface. The JSJ theory says that in fact this is the only way in which such splittings arise. So the problem above asks whether there are families of hyperbolic-hyperbolic splittings over the free group of rank 2, ${\mathbb F}_2$.